Why We Said No to a $250K RFP: Strategic IT for Canadian SMBs

Strategic IT

Written by Matthew Metelsky

Third Octet CEO | 20+ years MSP Experience

November 21, 2025

For growing Canadian SMBs, stability matters more than scale. Predictable service. Consistent outcomes. No surprises.

That is the lens we use for every growth decision, including turning down a recent quarter-million-dollar RFP. We ask a simple question: Will it protect the reliability our clients count on?

If not, we don’t pursue it.

A considered choice: the RFP opportunity

A national organization approached us with a request for 550 Microsoft 365 E3 licenses, Intune device and endpoint management, and several volume-driven services across a distributed workforce. The contract value was significant.

As we evaluated the engagement, one factor stood out. The RFP was calling for high throughput rather than partnership. The model focused on task volume, predefined deliverables, and rapid fulfilment. It left little space for the strategic planning, risk reduction, and proactive improvements that drive results for SMBs.

Accepting it would have shifted our resources away from advisory-focused work and reduced the consistency our clients expect. That tradeoff was not acceptable.

So we said no to the opportunity and yes to protecting client performance.

Why we said no: a decision rooted in discipline

This was not about capacity. It was about maintaining the operating principles that keep service quality predictable.

Large, transactional contracts often generate high ticket volume and reactive workloads. That approach reduces the time available for proactive support, security improvements, and governance planning. It also increases the risk of slower response times during peak periods.

By declining the RFP, we preserved the level of availability, responsiveness, and strategic attention our clients rely on. It was a financial decision made through the lens of operational risk.

For more on this leadership mindset, explore The Power of Letting Go (Without Losing Control), which explains why saying no is sometimes the clearest path to stronger outcomes.

Mission and fit: why alignment matters

Our best work happens with organizations that value clarity, strategy, and consistent performance. Clients within our 25 to 150 employee onboarding range receive predictable engineer-to-client ratios and stable operating rhythms. As these businesses grow, we adjust coverage, governance cadence, and security controls to match their scale.

A recent engagement with an HR services firm is a good example. By streamlining their environment and strengthening their security posture, we helped reduce disruptions and create a more predictable workflow. The impact was measurable: fewer issues, better team efficiency, and a clearer operating rhythm.

These results come from deep, long-term engagement. Not volume.

If you are assessing your IT approach, our guide on building a secure, employee-centric workplace offers a practical starting point.

The cost of misaligned work

Transactional, high-volume engagements may look efficient on paper, but they introduce real risk for SMBs. They create reactive workloads that strain engineering time and reduce the focus required to prevent incidents. They can also erode the consistency of communication, planning, and uptime management.

By choosing not to pursue misaligned work, we protect service stability, SLA adherence, and the proactive planning cycles that prevent downtime and reduce long-term cost.

This is how we safeguard client environments, not just service levels.

Our commitment to client success

Our best results come from engagements where we can improve stability, strengthen security, and support the people using the technology every day. For example, clients who paired Microsoft 365 deployment with targeted training reported measurable productivity gains and smoother daily workflows. These improvements were not accidental. They came from strategic design, proper enablement, and an operating model focused on long-term outcomes rather than volume-driven fulfilment.

This is the type of work we prioritize. It keeps environments predictable, supports consistent performance, and reduces avoidable issues for growing Canadian SMBs.

Protecting yes

We say no only when a request would compromise the quality of service we deliver to the clients who trust us most. That discipline ensures we can say yes to work that strengthens security, improves productivity, and supports the future of your business.

For us, growth is not about volume. It is about delivering consistent outcomes for organizations that value reliability and partnership.

Ready to see how a strategic IT partnership improves stability and long-term outcomes?

Let’s talk about what alignment looks like for your organization.

Schedule a Discovery Call

FAQS

Will you say no to my company?
We only say no when an engagement would reduce the quality of service we deliver to existing clients. If your organization values partnership, clarity, and long-term outcomes, we rarely find misalignment. Most Canadian SMBs in our range are an excellent fit. The only time we decline is when a request requires high-volume execution without strategic engagement, because that model stretches teams and weakens results for everyone.

What happens if we grow beyond 150 employees?
Growth is expected, and we plan for it. The 25 to 150 employee range reflects where our initial onboarding is most efficient. Many clients grow beyond that size while continuing with us successfully. As you expand, we adjust our engineer-to-client ratios, security controls, and governance cadence to match your scale. You will not “age out” of working with us. Instead, your environment evolves with a structured operating model designed to maintain stability as complexity increases.

How do you maintain service quality during peak periods?
We protect service quality through disciplined capacity planning. Our operating model includes predictable client-to-engineer ratios, workload forecasting, and reserved capacity for incident management. During peak seasons, we activate structured load-balancing across our team and prioritize proactive work earlier in the cycle to prevent bottlenecks. This approach keeps SLAs stable, reduces reactive tickets, and ensures clients experience consistent performance even when overall demand spikes.

 

 

You May Also Like…

0 Comments